Godina izdanja: 2001
ISBN: 953-07670-6-7
Jezik: Hrvatski
Autor: Strani

ROBERT PAUL WOLFF

U OBRANU ANARHIZMA

Prevod - Biljana Romić

Izdavač - DAF, Zagreb

Godina - 2001

100 strana

21 cm

Edicija - Biblioteka Ni dieu ni maître

ISBN - 953-07670-6-7

Povez - Broširan

Stanje - Kao na slici, tekst bez podvlačenja



SADRŽAJ:
Predgovor izdanju iz 1998
Predgovor

SUKOB VLASTI I AUTONOMIJE
1. Pojam vlasti
2. Pojam autonomije
3. Sukob vlasti i autonomije

KLASIČNA DEMOKRACIJA KAO RJEŠENJE
1. Demokracija kao jedino izvedivo rješenje
2. Jednoglasna izravna demokracija
3. Zastupnička demokratija
4. Većinska demokracija

ONKRAJ LEGITIMNE DRŽAVE
1. Potraga za legitimnom državom
2. Utopijski pogled na svet bez država

Kazalo imena i pojmova


`The book has three parts: `The Conflict between Authority and Autonomy,` `The Solution of Classical Democracy,` `Beyond the Legitimate State,` and an appendix, `Appendix: A proposal for Instant Direct Democracy.` The book opens with Part I, `The Conflict between Authority and Autonomy,` which Wolff begins by asserting that the moral autonomy of the individual can never be made compatible with the legitimate authority of the state.`

Part II, `The Solution of Classical Democracy,` is Wolff`s account of democratic liberalism, the dominant political structure of the late 20th century. He investigates unanimous direct democracy, representative democracy, and majoritarian democracy, drawing on Rawlsian arguments for the practicality of consensus decision-making. Wolff argues that consensus is limited by the requirement that participants are generally rational and altruistic, and that the community in question is not too large. He goes on to critique the notion of democratic representation, pointing out that representation is an illusion as representatives do not obey the wishes of their constituents, and that it is impossible not to distinguish between the rulers and the ruled in a representational system.

In Part III, `Beyond the Legitimate State,` Wolff arrives at the foreshadowed conclusion that because autonomy and the legitimacy of state power are incompatible, one must either embrace anarchism or surrender one`s autonomy, as Thomas Hobbes proposed, to whichever authority seems strongest at the time. Democracy, in this schema, is no better than dictatorship, a priori, as both require forsaking one`s autonomy.`



Ako Vas nešto zanima, slobodno pošaljite poruku.

Defense of Anarchism Pol Vulf